AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Run geekbench benchmark to test iphone8/14/2023 ![]() That single-core score was also better than the Galaxy Z Fold 4's 1,328 result, and that foldable phone ran on a newer Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1. ![]() The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2-powered reference design device Qualcomm gave us averaged a single-core score of 1,500, which topped the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 inside the Galaxy S22 Ultra by 21%. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Reference Design Traditionally, Apple's phones dominate this test, and while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 doesn't change that overall dynamic, the margin of victory for Apple's A series of mobile silicon is shrinking. To measure overall performance, we run the Geekbench 5 benchmark. The handset also sported a 6.8-inch AMOLED panel with FHD+ resolution and a 144Hz refresh rate. The reference design device we tested featured 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM. GPU power efficiency is expected to rise by 45%, too. Qualcomm says that should lead to a 25% boost in performance and 30% Vulkan uplift over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. It supports real-time hardware-accelerated ray tracing, too. (We're particularly excited by that latter promise, as the battery life of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1-powered phones didn't really impress.)Īs for the Adreno GPU, it's the first to offer Vulkan 1.3 support as well as a Snapdragon Game Post Processing Accelerator. Qualcomm expects its CPU to be 35% faster than the one on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while power efficiency is expected to improve by 40%. Qualcomm added an extra performance core for this version of its CPU for a total of four, while there are three efficiency cores. The Kryo CPU on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 uses a 3.2GHz prime core. Snapdragon 8 Gen 2: CPU and GPU changesīefore diving into the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 benchmark results, let's take a look at some of the changes Qualcomm made to the CPU and GPU and how that's expected to impact performance. (Apple uses the older A15 Bionic in the standard iPhone, while Pro models gets a boost from the A16 Bionic silicon.) Rounding out our test devices, we're including the Pixel 7 Pro and its Google-designed Tensor G2 processor. We're also comparing numbers from two recent iPhones - the iPhone 14 Pro Max and iPhone 14, which run on different chipsets. That includes the Galaxy S22 Ultra, which runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, as well as the Galaxy Z Fold 4 and its slightly faster Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 chipset. To put the results we got in context, we're posting our own test results conducted as part of our phone reviews of top flagship devices released in the past year. Perhaps the real gains will arrive with next year's A17 Bionic, which will supposedly be fabricated on TSMC's cutting-edge N3E node.For our testing, we used a reference design device supplied by Qualcomm that's powered by a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 system-on-chip. ![]() That isn't necessarily a bad thing, though.Īpple has consistently remained miles of the competition for nearly a decade, and it can afford to slack off for a generation to focus on power efficiency instead of raw performance. The handful of Geekbench runs we've seen indicate that it is little more than an incremental upgrade over the A15 Bionic, with the single-core gains sitting at around 5-7% and the multi-core gains at 10-12%. The initial Apple A16 Bionic reveal came off as a bit suspicious due to it being compared with a nearly three-year-old A13. It is also the first Apple A series chipset to breach the 5,000 points milestone on Geekbench's multi-core test, although the A15 Bionic has, on a few occasions, come within spitting distance. The former figure is nothing out of the ordinary, but the latter is a marked improvement. It nets a single-core score of 1,887 and a multi-core score of 5,455. Twitter leaker ShrimpApplePro stumbled upon what appears to be the iPhone 14 Pro on the benchmarking platform. Now, the SoC has redeemed itself with its second Geekbench appearance. While it still blows every Qualcomm/MediaTek/Exynos chipset out of the water, it cast doubt on Apple's lofty claims about its performance. The Apple A16 Bionic's first Geekbench run was a bit of a disaster, especially in the multi-core test, where it performed worse than its predecessor, the A15 Bionic.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |